Median AQI
19
Good
Montana · County air quality · 2025
Median AQI 19 (Good). 91.4% of monitored days rated Good, direct from EPA Air Quality System stations.
Phillips County's 2025 annual median AQI is 19 (Good), with 91.4% Good days
According to the U.S. EPA Air Quality System, Phillips County, Montana posted a 2025 median AQI of 19 (Good) across 314 monitored days, with 91.4% rated Good and 2 unhealthy or worse. This is an annual comparison, not today's advisory.
Data source EPA Air Quality System (AQS)
The verdict
According to EPA Air Quality System monitoring data, Phillips County's air is good on balance, cleaner than most US counties, a median AQI of 19 with 91.4% of 314 monitored days in the Good band, driven mainly by PM2.5.
2 days reached Unhealthy or worse; the worst single reading hit AQI 168.
Annual release change
Data updated August 2026
Across 314 monitored days, 287 fell in the Good band (AQI 0–50) and 2 reached Unhealthy or worse. The worst single day peaked at AQI 168 (Unhealthy).
EPA AQS →Air quality data from EPA Air Quality System (2025). 314 days monitored. Median AQI: 19 (Good).
Insights: Phillips County, Montana. EPA monitors recorded a median Air Quality Index of 19 across 314 measured days in 2025, earning a Good classification and a Excellent health grade. Of those days, 287 (91%) fell in the Good band (AQI 0–50), 22 (7%) registered Moderate readings, and 3 (1%) reached Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups. The 90th-percentile AQI settled at 47, while the worst single-day peak hit 168 (Unhealthy). Residents averaged about 27.4 clean-air days per 30-day window during the monitoring year.
The full pollutant mix ranks as PM2.5 (314 days). Across the 2020–2025 trend window, the share of monitored days rated Good shifted by +10.5 points (measured against 366 monitored days in 2020 and 314 in 2025, so raw day counts are not comparable) and the median AQI moved -17 points, placing the multi-year trajectory at improving. The annual record contains 2 days at Unhealthy or worse. On those days, the EPA recommends that sensitive groups limit prolonged outdoor exertion. Nearby counties show comparable readings: Beaverhead (94.7% good, AQI 13); Cascade (59.8% good, AQI 46); Custer (87.2% good, AQI 40); Dawson (90.3% good, AQI 18); Fergus (90.7% good, AQI 41); Flathead (73.7% good, AQI 41).
Median AQI
19
Good
Good Days
91.4%
287 of 314 monitored days
16.4pp vs 75% target
Max AQI Recorded
168
Unhealthy
Health Grade
Excellent
90th-pct AQI 47
Share of monitored days at AQI 0-50 (Good band).
Share of monitored days above AQI 150 (Unhealthy or worse). Bar maxes at 10% (worst-county ceiling).
Distribution of 314 monitored days across EPA AQI categories.
Good
287
91%
Moderate
22
7%
USG
3
1%
Unhealthy
2
1%
Very Unhealthy
0
0%
Hazardous
0
0%
Days where each pollutant was the primary driver of AQI readings in Phillips County.
Phillips County's air quality is rated Excellent based on 91.4% good air days. There were 2 unhealthy days in 2025 when outdoor activity should be limited.
Air quality is acceptable most days, but 3 days reached "Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups" (AQI 101-150) and peak AQI reached 168. Sensitive groups should monitor real-time conditions at AirNow.gov.
The dominant pollutant is PM2.5, driving AQI on 314 of 314 monitored days.
Air quality is improving in Phillips County. Highest Good-day share: 2022 (94.2%, 344 of 365 monitored days).
| Year | Good | Moderate | USG | Unhealthy | Median AQI | Max AQI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 296 | 68 | 2 | 0 | 36 | 140 |
| 2021 | 292 | 64 | 5 | 0 | 36 | 146 |
| 2022 | 344 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 89 |
| 2023 | 289 | 64 | 4 | 7 | 38 | 199 |
| 2024 | 323 | 37 | 2 | 0 | 21 | 147 |
| 2025 | 287 | 22 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 168 |
Nationwide peers within about the same annual median AQI as Phillips County (19), not geographic neighbors.
Cass County, Nebraska
Median AQI 19 · 95.9% Good-day share
Garfield County, Washington
Median AQI 19 · 92.5% Good-day share
Marquette County, Michigan
Median AQI 19 · 82.4% Good-day share
Pitkin County, Colorado
Median AQI 19 · 92.3% Good-day share
Dawson County, Montana
Median AQI 18 · 90.3% Good-day share
Hughes County, South Dakota
Median AQI 18 · 93.0% Good-day share
PM2.5 led the AQI on the most monitored days here. These peers share that driver and the closest Good-day share (a second relationship type beyond median-AQI neighbors).
Ponce County, Puerto Rico
91.4% Good-day share · median AQI 3
Lewis County, Washington
91.3% Good-day share · median AQI 20
Matanuska-Susitna County, Alaska
91.5% Good-day share · median AQI 9
Alamosa County, Colorado
91.5% Good-day share · median AQI 25
Glacier County, Montana
91.7% Good-day share · median AQI 23
Douglas County, Nevada
91.1% Good-day share · median AQI 22
Geographic containment only, other monitored counties in Montana, independent of AQI or pollutant match.
What Phillips County's air means for you
On most days the air here is fine, but PM2.5 drives 2 unhealthy-or-worse days a year that sensitive groups should plan around.
Based on 314 EPA-monitored days in 2025; figures reflect only days the monitors reported. Source: EPA Air Quality System annual summaries.
Primary Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Air Quality System (AQS), Annual AQI by County dataset, 2020–2025 (aqs.epa.gov). For current conditions (not shown here — this page is historical annual data), see EPA AirNow (airnow.gov). See our methodology for how AQI, median, and coverage figures are computed.
Informational only, not professional advice. Data from EPA AQS. See our disclaimer. Spotted a figure that looks wrong? Report a correction.
Source: U.S. EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Annual AQI by county summary files for Phillips County, Montana · 2020–2025
Send the source-year summary or download its ready-to-use data card.
Download this county's annual AQI row as CSV , with the same EPA fields and denominator shown on this page.
Every figure on PlainAirData is rendered directly from EPA AQS air-quality monitoring data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on EPA AQS air-quality monitoring data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.